Formula 1 is at a turning point, and Red Bull’s director, Laurent Mekies, is aware of it. The consensus in the paddock is clear: qualifying needs to be reinvented to be contested “at full throttle”. Indeed, managing electric energy has become a major issue for the future of racing.
A Paradigm Shift in Qualifying
Since the introduction of the 2026 regulations, the dynamics of qualifying have been disrupted. The distribution of power between the internal combustion engine and the electric motor is now equitable, but this has consequences for driving. Drivers, instead of attacking as before, find themselves juggling between energy optimisation and performance. A true game of chess where every corner counts.
The term lift and coast has become commonplace: it is a technique where drivers ease off the accelerator in corners to recharge their batteries. This results in slower trajectories, making qualifying less spectacular. This change not only invites criticism; it completely redefines the relationship with speed on the circuit.
Mekies sums up the situation well: “If there is one thing we all agree on – all the teams, the FIA, F1, and the drivers – it is that we would all like to see qualifying where we go flat out.” These words illustrate a shared desire to introduce more adrenaline into this crucial exercise.
The Stakes for 2027
In this context, Mekies advocates for a focus on 2027. Even if some changes could be considered as early as this year, it is clear that a long-term vision is necessary. “We should focus on how to do things right for 2027,” he asserts. A vision that reflects a pragmatic anticipation in the face of growing criticism.
The F1 calendar is tight, but adjustments are possible, especially with the cancellation of the Bahrain and Saudi Arabian Grands Prix. For Mekies, every small improvement counts: “We still have time to do what is necessary if we want to sort this out by 2027.”
Performance on a Rollercoaster
Laurent Mekies converses with Max Verstappen during a Grand Prix.
Despite the criticism regarding qualifying, the performance of the 2026 single-seaters is not to be overlooked. Thanks to their rapid acceleration, they manage to achieve times close to those of previous seasons. For instance, Kimi Antonelli secured a pole position at Suzuka just 1.8 seconds slower than Max Verstappen’s in 2025.
This demonstrates that despite a restrictive regulatory framework, teams are managing to get the best out of their machines. It remains to be seen whether this trend will continue as the circuits become more demanding.
Opinions Diverge in the Paddock
In the paddock, opinions on energy management vary. Some believe that the complexity of strategies during the race should be reduced to promote a more engaging spectacle. Others emphasise the importance of optimising every element to maximise performance. This reveals a divide between those who want more excitement and those who prioritise strategy.
Mekies himself admits that “we can probably adjust the level of management during the race.” But as discussions continue, the real question remains: how to make qualifying more exciting while preserving the overall spectacle of the race? The answer may unfold over the seasons.
A Pivotal Year for the Future
The year 2026 is thus one of change and experimentation. F1 must adapt to these new dynamics while retaining its essence. The stakes are high: to offer a spectacle that attracts not only enthusiasts but also a broader audience.
With a delicate balance between performance and energy strategy, the road to 2027 will be fraught with challenges but full of promise. Fans hope to quickly see thrilling qualifying sessions, worthy of the greatest moments in F1 history.
In Summary
- Mekies calls for a redesign of qualifying for 2027.
- Electric energy management redefines driving in qualifying.
- The performance of single-seaters remains competitive despite criticism.
- Opinions diverge in the paddock on strategic management during races.
- The year 2026 will be crucial for the future of the spectacle in F1.
